<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Span your Aperture library across multiple disks</title>
	<link>http://beardedjoe.com/span-your-aperture-library-across-multiple-disks</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://beardedjoe.com/span-your-aperture-library-across-multiple-disks#comment-78</link>
		<author>jason</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beardedjoe.com/span-your-aperture-library-across-multiple-disks#comment-78</guid>
		<description>yeah, masters are the physical images, everything else (versions, previews, etc) are in the kbs in size. this is cause the actual image is not affected. any editing you've done is saved in a way that doesn't harm the image but also doesn't create another duplicate image. only when you export does the image get the edits added on physically to preserve the original import and save tons of disk space.

i agree, i like the approach. i got aperture a few months ago been spending the whole time since naming tagging and rating my 4,000+ photos taken over the past 2-3 years...truly a mind numbing process. i'd have to account for 1 star photos (i try not to have no star ratings i guess heh), but good idea over all for external drives and not redundant drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, masters are the physical images, everything else (versions, previews, etc) are in the kbs in size. this is cause the actual image is not affected. any editing you&#8217;ve done is saved in a way that doesn&#8217;t harm the image but also doesn&#8217;t create another duplicate image. only when you export does the image get the edits added on physically to preserve the original import and save tons of disk space.</p>
<p>i agree, i like the approach. i got aperture a few months ago been spending the whole time since naming tagging and rating my 4,000+ photos taken over the past 2-3 years&#8230;truly a mind numbing process. i&#8217;d have to account for 1 star photos (i try not to have no star ratings i guess heh), but good idea over all for external drives and not redundant drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jt</title>
		<link>http://beardedjoe.com/span-your-aperture-library-across-multiple-disks#comment-72</link>
		<author>jt</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beardedjoe.com/span-your-aperture-library-across-multiple-disks#comment-72</guid>
		<description>hey!

this is an interesting approach!
I do have a couple questions...
What's the benefit of 'relocating masters' as opposed to something that would move a whole project? does that leave the versions or previews available for some sort of 'quick preview?'

And could you 'relocate masters' directly  to a folder on the ext hd?

Cheers,

JT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey!</p>
<p>this is an interesting approach!<br />
I do have a couple questions&#8230;<br />
What&#8217;s the benefit of &#8216;relocating masters&#8217; as opposed to something that would move a whole project? does that leave the versions or previews available for some sort of &#8216;quick preview?&#8217;</p>
<p>And could you &#8216;relocate masters&#8217; directly  to a folder on the ext hd?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>JT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
